If I hear the bloody "freedom of speech" crap on this forum again.........lol
why is it freedom of speech is only ever spouted when someone doesn't agree with an opinion? and it is almost always by the person who starts the offensive comments first
exhibit a
StanTheMan Wrote:But Kelly Bell is not pleasant on the eye. I find those huge pumped up mounds of silicone she likes to call her breasts positively revolting. And anyway, this isn't a 'who do you find most attractive' question, I'm trying to ascertain who has given the rudest daytime performance and by no stretch of the imagination was KB's knickerless performance ruder that Celeste's!
Up to this point people had been commenting on who they thought had given the rudest performance, in their opinion (to quote your good self Stan), the appearance etc was simply to explain the reasons for their choice. It was infact you yourself who changed the discussion point by focusing on appearance only.
You also have to accept that perhaps this was the only "rude" performance they had seen. Just because they didn't agree with your choice doesn't mean it was going off topic
If you want to make a statement on behalf of "freedom of choice" then ensure you are allowing others theirs as well
But to insult those that do not agree....
exhibit b
StanTheMan Wrote:Finally! So not all posters here are aged 14 and under then?
exhibit c
StanTheMan Wrote:I'm neither. Bell isn't the least bit attractive IN MY OPINION!! She isn't pretty, has ridiculous looking 'breasts', and only moves when she picks her drink up from the floor. The majority of adults would not find Bell in the least bit attractive, of that I'm sure.
You really are unbelievable! Freedom of speech is alive and well... except here, obviously. I'm being attacked for having my own opinion?
There are many sad little fuckers on here, quickly closing ranks on anyone whose opinion doesn't match their own deluded ideas of what constitutes beauty.
the person doing the most attacking would actually appear to be yourself, people are merely reacting to your posts.
you say "There are many sad little fuckers on here, quickly closing ranks on anyone whose opinion doesn't match their own deluded ideas of what constitutes beauty" while simultaneously bang on about "freedom of speech". How can you advocate "freedom of speech" while at the same time claiming everyone else's opinion is wrong (the "deluded ideas of what constitutes beauty" does this, other wise you have to start re-reading what you are posting if that was not your intention)
But I challenge you to find anyone in this thread attacking celeste in the same way as you regularly attack Kelly Bell. That in itself kinda settles the point of "freedom of speech" in this thread
StanTheMan Wrote:It wasn't me that turned this into a Bell Vs Celeste debate.
I think the previous quotes show that actually it was you that turned this thread into a Bell v Celeste debate.
I think, in hindsight, you would have been better off naming this thread "Celeste's performance was really rude" or similar in order to keep it exclusively talking about Celeste, which was obviously your want.
as i previously stated - i have no idea who celeste is....so i couldn't say her performance was the rudest if i've never seen it