Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 29 Vote(s) - 3.41 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Lola Knight - (Ultimate Babe 2018 & 2019) - Chat & Discussion (Only)

Author Message
kelly1066 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,763
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 88
Post: #611
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
(23-05-2016 21:24 )wackawoo Wrote:  One of not the biggest grossing profit films was 'deep throat' the was filmed for peanuts, the cast got jack shit and it earnt millions upon millions

and people wonder why linda lovelace spent most of the rest of her life wanting to not be asked about or associated with that movie...? from what i saw in a recent documentary on her....

porn always has been, and always will be dominated by men using women, but then a lot of women have also made a good living out of it too; paid more than the men which is rare in any industry.... most porn studs go back into obscurity as soon as they age a little or lose the wood, while names like jenna jameson will be remembered far longer? there are a couple of female run porn companies in the uk, anna span to name but one, but she more into lesbian porn from what little ive seen of her movies....

incidentally, i think lola will go the way of plenty other equally desirable girls; in that her lack of timekeeping and slightly random attitude will see her being dumped, move on, dumped, move on... then eventually turn to 'other' work to earn a crust; whether that be escorting, dancing, porn, or any other way she may choose to earn a crust with her body rather than her brain.... sad, but likely going to be true...

I never sit on the fence. I prefer to drop kick it out the way instead! Could possibly be a big fan of wankspangling?
23-05-2016 23:38
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wackawoo Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,204
Joined: Feb 2015
Post: #612
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
(23-05-2016 23:38 )kelly1066 Wrote:  porn always has been, and always will be dominated by men using women, but then a lot of women have also made a good living out of it too; paid more than the men which is rare in any industry.... most porn studs go back into obscurity as soon as they age a little or lose the wood, while names like jenna jameson will be remembered far longer? there are a couple of female run porn companies in the uk, anna span to name but one, but she more into lesbian porn from what little ive seen of her movies....

There's always been woman who will use woman, they get paid more than men per scene, true, but it's by far the majority of men who's making the BIG bucks.

If you think of the amount of porn on the internet, it is a wash with it, only the tiniest minority of woman make a name from it.

At least 2 of the most well known, Linda Lovelace and Tracy Lords both regret it, like a lot do; I also could provide a link with all those that have commited scuicide.

I suppose porn is one of those things that will never go away, may be if woman are running it with womens welfare in mind may be thats the way it should go.

A lot on here think it's a lot of people having sex and enjoying it, not necassarily the case.
24-05-2016 00:05
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
setter1000 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 2,057
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 44
Post: #613
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
http://www.therichest.com/expensive-life.../?view=all

From what I see women make quite a few quid more than their male counterpoints in porn. It's not the lucrative industry it used to be in the 90s by all accounts.

In regard to Lola its a shame if those story's about her lack of reliability is true. A few of the girls in times past have been known to be unreliable in terms of turning up on time if at all. I don't know why that is. I would have thought that if there was one industry it's imperative that you turn up on time and are ready to put in an 8 hour shift it would be this one. It's not as if they are not well paid for it.

(This post was last modified: 25-05-2016 15:47 by setter1000.)
25-05-2016 15:46
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wackawoo Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,204
Joined: Feb 2015
Post: #614
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
(25-05-2016 15:46 )setter1000 Wrote:  http://www.therichest.com/expensive-life.../?view=all

From what I see women make quite a few quid more than their male counterpoints in porn. It's not the lucrative industry it used to be in the 90s by all accounts.

I'd probably take the amount woman get with a pinch of salt, and notice it keeps saying 'top', not the hundreds of thousands of nameless east european porn actresses that do it probably because it's the only way to get a decent amount of money together.

Even with the 'top' ones it says:

"""This is hardly a windfall paycheck especially if you consider the kind of money that top mainstream Hollywood actors make. On top of this, agents take 10% – 15% of the performer’s pay."""

Then you take the likes of Padre Damien, that utterly repulsive creature has fucked hundreds of the most beautiful girls, including westy and Katrina Hartlove

Here's a sample

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=padre+...n+hardcore

And with women with bodies every bit as good as Lola's

http://t1.pixhost.org/thumbs/1983/609555...damian.jpg


These woman will be getting a few hundred dollers probably a couple of hundred of pounds.

I'd love to know what those babes that actually fucked the vile fiona cooper got. Bet it weren't thousands.

That link might make girls think it's a great way to make mega bucks.

They should take the example of that Miss America, lost her title, lost everything, and public humiliation for one porn scene the makers saw an opputunatly to make money out of her name on and then never used her any more because they thought she was crap.
25-05-2016 21:01
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
setter1000 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 2,057
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 44
Post: #615
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
I remember in the 90s Ron Jeremy saying how unfair it was that female rookies were making more money than him and he was a porn legend. After watching Louis Theroux program on the porn industry I got the impression it's not the lucrative trade it used to be. I remember a producer making 125m in one year out of it in the 90s saying those days have now gone. In the 90s blokes were averaging 250$ per shoot and women 1500$. Certainly in real terms the performer earnings seem to have diminished considerably. However I certainly would like to See Lola do a boy girl hardcore scene. Think she would do well if she did go into the porn business.

(This post was last modified: 26-05-2016 00:16 by setter1000.)
25-05-2016 21:33
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
kelly1066 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,763
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 88
Post: #616
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
Back to Lola... It would be a shame if she got canned or left, as she really does have potential that I think has not yet been fully exploited for both her own earning potential, and for the enjoyment of all those people watching...?

I never sit on the fence. I prefer to drop kick it out the way instead! Could possibly be a big fan of wankspangling?
(This post was last modified: 25-05-2016 23:40 by kelly1066.)
25-05-2016 23:39
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TheProf Offline
Master Poster
****

Posts: 536
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 5
Post: #617
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
(25-05-2016 23:39 )kelly1066 Wrote:  Back to Lola... It would be a shame if she got canned or left, as she really does have potential that I think has not yet been fully exploited for both her own earning potential, and for the enjoyment of all those people watching...?

The fabulous Lola seemed to be making great progress on S66 up to and around the time of the "Fun with the crew" events which I personally found to be very enjoyable and a great reason to watch/ phone in to S66.
Then onwards her shows have become fewer and she is usually teamed up with another girl - which completely upsets her performances i.m.o. Is this just a coincidence? or S66 intervening to keep things "under control"
Recently, as others here have observed, Lola seems to be really down, and not enjoying her shows.
I really hope that she gets some more opportunities - although the chances of a solo spot on S66 are thin - with the favouritism policy they employ.
26-05-2016 18:43
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tbone83 Offline
Senior Poster
***

Posts: 257
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 6
Post: #618
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
she has always been one of my favs, I dearly hope she doesn't disappear from our screens. Although it might mean I do something more productive with my time than sitting in front of the tv with my pants round my ankles
27-05-2016 00:06
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
setter1000 Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 2,057
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 44
Post: #619
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
I would have thought sitting In front of the tv with your pants around your ankles would be productive if you are doing what I think you are doing. The shows are a cut throat business and are ruthless towards the girls who are not getting the callers. From what I hear she does not always turn up on time if at all. I'm not sure how true that is but if so, you do suspect the worst for her in terms of her future on the shows.

(This post was last modified: 27-05-2016 08:37 by setter1000.)
27-05-2016 08:36
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
wackawoo Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,204
Joined: Feb 2015
Post: #620
RE: Lola Knight - Studio 66 - Chat & Discussion
(27-05-2016 08:36 )setter1000 Wrote:  From what I hear she does not always turn up on time if at all. I'm not sure how true that is but if so, you do suspect the worst for her in terms of her future on the shows.

Maybe that's why she looked particularly miserable the other night, sacked or something.
27-05-2016 13:03
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply