Maddison Mae Chat & Discussion

(06-06-2015 20:41 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  As I have often said, if a babe does a show I like, then I will post, if I don't like a show, I won't post.

As for if Maddison is a good signing for bs, your right, it's the latter depends how bs use her

Ofc u r super neutral... it is not like u have gone from being the top poster in the Keira thread on S66 to not posting at all in her BS thread.... where she has been doing solo stints and used better.

Great news, lets see Maddison full screen on her own and on more often.

(06-06-2015 20:41 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  As I have often said, if a babe does a show I like, then I will post, if I don't like a show, I won't post.

As for if Maddison is a good signing for bs, your right, it's the latter depends how bs use her

But was Maddison used terribly effectively by S66?
Maybe I might be in a minority but I believe the answer is no.
Will she be used well at BS?
Who knows?
Are many babes being used particularly well by any channels?
In most cases no imo.

What I would say to you Rammy is that in fairness to all channels the question of how well babes are used is now one that can equally apply to both S66 and BS rather than just one or the other . If S66 deploy a babe in constant non solo action with no meaningful sexual interaction while on a boring set then I would argue this is perhaps no better or worse than any mismanagement of stint that BS may be guilty of.
The BS airtime problem which I am guessing you are making indirect reference to is no longer such a prominent issue anyway now and this is largely due to what appears to be the dilution or possible removal of Dutch Licence conditions on BS1. The airtime I see allocated on BS appears to me to have levelled off somewhat overall.

So as I say I think the question of how effectively each babe is deployed is now just as relevant on all channels but most notably S66 and BS for differing reasons.

(06-06-2015 20:41 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  As I have often said, if a babe does a show I like, then I will post, if I don't like a show, I won't post.

As for if Maddison is a good signing for bs, your right, it's the latter depends how bs use her

Who knows she may take her shows to a whole new level on BS as she will probably get more solo air time

Plus im sure BS signing Maddison will please the natural tits only brigade as BS probably do need a couple of natural babes

Maddison is due to start on BS tomorrow (the 5th), and she says on twitter that she is going to be going by a new name, doesn't say what.

(04-07-2015 22:54 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  Maddison is due to start on BS tomorrow (the 5th), and she says on twitter that she is going to be going by a new name, doesn't say what.

I will guess at Mae/May If i am right somebody needs to get me a prize

(07-06-2015 00:33 )Joey 27 Wrote:  

(06-06-2015 20:41 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  As I have often said, if a babe does a show I like, then I will post, if I don't like a show, I won't post.

As for if Maddison is a good signing for bs, your right, it's the latter depends how bs use her

Who knows she may take her shows to a whole new level on BS as she will probably get more solo air time

Plus im sure BS signing Maddison will please the natural tits only brigade as BS probably do need a couple of natural babes

I agree she is a great signing for BS, especially if you're a fan of natural girls.

@Whynot, you'll have to take that up with Madison or the Babestation producers, maybe a signed mug...

Maddy Mae? that will be enough to avoid confusion with Madison Rose I think

(04-07-2015 23:42 )TheLaughingMan Wrote:  ...maybe a signed mug...

Already enough of us mugs round here I would have thought!*

* Not meant to be taken seriously by anyone stupid** enough to do so.

** Nor that!

So where is she... Yet another no show.

she could be unwell as yesterday she tweeted she's got a root canal infection and is on antibiotics