Partyland...Good or Bad?

i have watched the channel a few times now and i actually feel that it is a step down from the old party girls format....barely any nudity and constant foot shots...at least party girls showed some sort of girl-on-girl...however tame it was... but one of the presenters when asked to to that type of stuff said 'its not that type of show'...

So what do you think...partyland...GOOD or BAD?

Leave messages and vote above...

I voted yes hope im not the only one im not saying is it better than partygirls its still in the early stages , however i do belive it has pontential. Maybe if they hired more girls its seems that all i ever see is candy and lolly .

its not any different from babecast

Why have bad as an option, why not " needs improving " instead.

Good for freeview viewers, bad for sky viewers.

There is room for improvement.
A good start would be for candy to get both tits out at once

a load of bollacks they have tamed lolly fucking badcock

babefinder Wrote:a load of bollacks they have tamed lolly fucking badcock

I dont know how Lolly acts on other channels, but she is filthy as fuck on the phone

Ok for a flirty text show, but they should dedicate two girls reading texts at least 50% of on air time if not all the time full screen if thats what they are going for.

Poor for an erotic call in show, but I guess there's only so much room for manoeuvre in that particular genre

I'm not voting because it is neither good nor bad.
It could certainly be a lot better than it is.
Its getting boring since one nights show is much the same as the previous night.
The girls chatting on mic is quite interesting.
They have a good sized high quality picture (unlike PartyGirls) but ruin it sometimes with a split screen display.
The girls are good looking (11 different ones so far) but are too static. They dont move about much. Same poses most of the time from them.
No girl-girl stuff like PartyGirls had.
Too much feet stuff, no proper bum to camera shots.