Madison - Chat & Discussion

^^^Who said they dont have a dutch licence? This tame shit is all down to babestation!!! When was the last time they even got an ofcom fine,did they get one for the cucumber 241 or fingergate? If they didn't for those shows id say maddy is free to do as she pleases but being self censored by BS.

As for maddison her povs are good viewing,great chemistry with the cameraman which makes it better than the other women.

This whole non Dutch license thing is confusing to me. So they no longer have any Dutch license, yet they now allow nude POVs where it's suggested that the cameraman might be having some fun with the women? That seems like something they'd do WITH the Dutch license.

Then again, Studio 66 did POVs where you'd actually see the women grinding the cameraman's crotches (With thongs on), so who knows.

I may have mis-remembered this but I think one of Maddie's recent pov sections was done on BS Blue, there's nothing explicit about it so what difference does it make. Any 'suggestions' are down to the mind of the viewer, oh what fun it must be to have such an imagination.

Imaginations are nice, yes, but my point was that I find it odd that they don't show her lower half much at all, even if nothing is happening. Watching this type of POV is nice, but when all we see is the upper half of the women for most of it, to me it gets boring. At least with Studio 66, they pushed the boundaries more despite the women being topless only for most of the sessions. It's not so much that I need to see actual contact, as it is that if any channel could get away with it, it would be Babestation.

Also, if we're getting these POV sessions with implied activity, why not allow female to female sessions with the same? That way we'd have a nice alternative to the tame 2-4-1s of late.

Yes studio66 did some great pov shows when yasmine and lucy summers were there,lucy was grinding her cameraman for nearly an hour one night,you could see him on screen and nothing ever came of it with ofcom.

BS is improving its pov shows,lori and maddy seem to be the only ones interacting with the cameraman though.

(17-09-2015 22:27 )forumdude Wrote:  ^^^Who said they dont have a dutch licence? This tame shit is all down to babestation!!! When was the last time they even got an ofcom fine,did they get one for the cucumber 241 or fingergate? If they didn't for those shows id say maddy is free to do as she pleases but being self censored by BS.

As for maddison her povs are good viewing,great chemistry with the cameraman which makes it better than the other women.

I believe that BS was granted an Ofcom license a few months ago as posted by Mr Mystery,they also renamed 906 as Babenation,so unless things have reverted back to how they were before March,BS1 is Dutch licensed on Freeview only,hope this explains what i meant in my last post.

Madison was my babe of the night last night. very hot & filthy in each stint she did last night including of course lots of twerking

By the looks of things this famous licence seems to follow danni harwood from channel to channel.Crew didn't seem to mind her rubbing her on pussy on bsxtra earlier tonight.Hope maddison follows suit!

recently reshown clip...



http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1754423

Maddie looks great all oily in the garage, there's a "is that a wrench in your pocket or are you pleased to see me ? " joke in there somewhere