Babestation - General Chat & Discussion

And the result of this producer 'enforced' shite?! Phone twiddling galore!

(28-08-2016 00:08 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  now it's triple babe time on 909!!!!! 5 babes for 3 channels is too many

Quite agree,during the Dutch regulated period there were many occasions when having five or more babes would have been ideal,but under current OFCOM regs all it seems to do is censor how far one babe can due to another,or tonight 2 others being present,in summary two or more babes who can interact was a good idea but putting three together under current restrictions is madness,particularly when two of them have put stronger solo stints on for some time.

I agree with the recent comments, during the BangBabes era 4 girls sharing one camers was great, because they could interact with each other.

Sadly, in this current climate even 2 girls sharing a camera is awful, because the producers and camera man have to split the attention between multiple hosts.

I hate that the cameraman won't zoom in on Sophia Lares sucking her nipples, because he wants to zoom in on Ella Jolie's feet instead.

(28-08-2016 00:22 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:08 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  now it's triple babe time on 909!!!!! 5 babes for 3 channels is too many

Quite agree,during the Dutch regulated period there were many occasions when having five or more babes would have been ideal,but under current OFCOM regs all it seems to do is censor how far one babe can due to another,or tonight 2 others being present,in summary two or more babes who can interact was a good idea but putting three together under current restrictions is madness,particularly when two of them have put stronger solo stints on for some time.

I would be very surprised if the extreme tameness, and the other shit that's wrong with the channels these days, is anything to do with 'Ofcon'.

(28-08-2016 00:34 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:22 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:08 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  now it's triple babe time on 909!!!!! 5 babes for 3 channels is too many

Quite agree,during the Dutch regulated period there were many occasions when having five or more babes would have been ideal,but under current OFCOM regs all it seems to do is censor how far one babe can due to another,or tonight 2 others being present,in summary two or more babes who can interact was a good idea but putting three together under current restrictions is madness,particularly when two of them have put stronger solo stints on for some time.

I would be very surprised if the extreme tameness, and the other shit that's wrong with the channels these days, is anything to do with 'Ofcon'.

Correct me if im wrong but although OFCOM may not be fully responsible,it was them who banned 241s with actual contact in 2012,so this was why i expressed my opinion on the need for more than four babes a night under current restrictions,some by the regulator and equally bs must share the blame as well.

(28-08-2016 00:46 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:34 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:22 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:08 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  now it's triple babe time on 909!!!!! 5 babes for 3 channels is too many

Quite agree,during the Dutch regulated period there were many occasions when having five or more babes would have been ideal,but under current OFCOM regs all it seems to do is censor how far one babe can due to another,or tonight 2 others being present,in summary two or more babes who can interact was a good idea but putting three together under current restrictions is madness,particularly when two of them have put stronger solo stints on for some time.

I would be very surprised if the extreme tameness, and the other shit that's wrong with the channels these days, is anything to do with 'Ofcon'.

Correct me if im wrong but although OFCOM may not be fully responsible,it was them who banned 241s with actual contact in 2012,so this was why i expressed my opinion on the need for more than four babes a night under current restrictions,some by the regulator and equally bs must share the blame as well.

That doesn't force the broadcaster to put two or three babes on-screen at the same time, though; in fact, logically, it should make such things less likely.
As far as I can see, it is purely a decision by the broadcaster.

And, yes, as I've said for sometime now, five babes is too many.

(28-08-2016 00:46 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:34 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:22 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  

(28-08-2016 00:08 )Rammyrascal Wrote:  now it's triple babe time on 909!!!!! 5 babes for 3 channels is too many

Quite agree,during the Dutch regulated period there were many occasions when having five or more babes would have been ideal,but under current OFCOM regs all it seems to do is censor how far one babe can due to another,or tonight 2 others being present,in summary two or more babes who can interact was a good idea but putting three together under current restrictions is madness,particularly when two of them have put stronger solo stints on for some time.

I would be very surprised if the extreme tameness, and the other shit that's wrong with the channels these days, is anything to do with 'Ofcon'.

Correct me if im wrong but although OFCOM may not be fully responsible,it was them who banned 241s with actual contact in 2012,so this was why i expressed my opinion on the need for more than four babes a night under current restrictions,some by the regulator and equally bs must share the blame as well.

Ofcom has nothing to do with it,the 6months in and around the danni/lucy cucumber show was way after 2012 and that was all the babes doing great 241.

Tame shows on bs is and always will be a money making strategy! Can't sell those shit 4 minute pov videos if the babes are putting on better pov on tv.
No one was worried about sophie showing pussy last night so why make a big deal if the babes suck each others tits.

(28-08-2016 00:14 )Censorship :-( Wrote:  Three babes shoehorned onto a tiny set, and two pervcams - can they make it any worse?!

I suggest 5 babes on a bed all with miserable and gormless facial expressions on all three BS channels with multiple pervcams, endless phone waving and a new one minute challenge to be introduced . Furthermore all calls to be interrupted every thirty seconds with plugging of every BS pic and vid ever made with plentiful cutting to logo at every opportunity .
Calls to be £1000 per minute with a connection charge of £1000000 .

I'll get my coat

^ I think someone's hoping for the Head Producer's job at Tamestation!

Five babes scheduled for Sunday night, too - NOOOooooooo...