Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 95 Vote(s) - 3.97 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion

Author Message
beresv Offline
Reloaded
***

Posts: 215
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 15
Post: #4011
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
just no need to wait for something grand from CallCenter66

Charming Clare but this site is spending her time - just sayin ©
31-08-2016 18:45
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,689
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #4012
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(31-08-2016 14:51 )HEX!T Wrote:  its an advert for phonesex, not a 9 hour stripathon.

Ok so an advert for phone sex and for too much of the time from too many babes on too many channels not a very good one in my eyes. If the point is to bring in calls then I am open to the idea.
But the right level of visual stimulus needs to be there in the first place to attract my call especially bearing in mind the cost of the call. If I am going to pay up to £2.00 a minute for anything I think I have the right to want something pretty damned good to part with that sort of cash. That for me means the babes and channels need to work together to allow the best show to be put on. So yes set variety and quality are important as is the movement and quality of visual stimulus.
It is not unreasonable imo to want top quality visual stimulation.
If the babes and channels want the calls I say 'Well put on a show then I will pick up the phone'.
Sounds like a fair deal to me Wink.
I have been watching and calling these shows for a number of years now and I certainly do not regard them as a 9 hour stripathon. Every caller and viewer wants different things from a nightshow and looks at them through different eyes.
What satisfies one may not satisfy another.
But I get a sense (rightly or wrongly) that the shows are satisfying less and less people judging by the amount of times I seem to hear babes bemoaning lack of calls.
Maybe it is satisfaction or lack of it relative to call costs.
I think that applies to me anyway.
My nights of phone bill hammerings are long gone which is undoubtedly a good thing.
Sometimes good comes out of crap Wink bladewavelaugh.
Clare compared to nights of old is not what she used to be imo.
Some of that, maybe even a lot of it is not her fault but there is frustration nonetheless even from her it seems.

I can well imagine boredom and frustration are part of the job for the babes. And they think it is isn't for anyone else in any other profession? Most people I meet confess to boredom and frustration in their various jobs and I doubt anyone is completely immune to it. I hear a lot about 'Every day I seem to do the same stuff, hear the same stuff and get nowhere quickly' from many people I know.
So if the babes want any sympathy for feeling the same the reply may be 'Welcome to our world' Wink.
The babes have an opportunity to entertain and provide some light relief. So take it. My calls at least will follow and hopefully more besides just mine. More calls, more fun, more enjoyment for more people more of the time.
Everyone's a winner Wink.

(This post was last modified: 31-08-2016 20:41 by Snooks.)
31-08-2016 20:40
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HEX!T Away
Retired
*****

Posts: 6,298
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 143
Post: #4013
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
the right level of visual stimulus is there if you dont watch every hour of every day mate is my point.
much of what you say makes sense but only if your not watching anything else.
like i said if your watching 20-30 mins a couple of times a week. then the shows dont seem anywhere near as repetitive.
especially if your not calling/watching the same girl as last time.

i watched clare the other night and to me she looked great. i hadnt watched her for 3-4 shifts. but the 20 mins i was watching everything was there. clare was moving and grinding on her chair, she was smiling and talking filth. add in the almost perfect view of the pervecam and i would give her 11/11.
well 10/10 but i still wanna give her 1 Tongue

so while i do understand what your saying, for most viewers repetition is not an issue.

Any Babe pics posted are my Take on existing photographs. credits for the original images stays with the copyright holder if any rights apply.

Today im wearing a gray hat. tomorrow it might be white or black, it depends on my mood
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2016 00:24 by HEX!T.)
01-09-2016 00:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,689
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #4014
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
I see your point too mate Wink.
However I should point out I don't spend all night watching the shows Wink. I don't really have the time, energy or inclination.
Oh and I have to get up pretty early to go to work Wink.
A lot of the time I give up pretty early knowing what is likely to transpire and saving myself the disappointment of being proven correct Rolleyeslaugh.
But I would rather not give up so quickly and ring up a babe doing an awesome show Shy.

20 minutes to half an hour often ends up being as much as I can tolerate anyway Bounce. In a sense I am led back to my initial point in my last post. For me the quality of advert for phone sex is rarely good enough to make me part with my money whether I watch for half an hour, three hours or all night and judging by what seems like an ongoing complaint from babes at lack of calls it may be others feel the same. If others are taking the same view as me then the phone advert quality is open to question.

This being said however I have been watching these shows for a good number of years and in that sense nightshow over familiarity has set in Rolleyes.
You have a point WinkTongue.

(This post was last modified: 01-09-2016 01:08 by Snooks.)
01-09-2016 00:38
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
steviebaby Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,311
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 26
Post: #4015
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(01-09-2016 00:21 )HEX!T Wrote:  the right level of visual stimulus is there if you dont watch every hour of every day mate is my point.
much of what you say makes sense but only if your not watching anything else.
like i said if your watching 20-30 mins a couple of times a week. then the shows dont seem anywhere near as repetitive.
especially if your not calling/watching the same girl as last time.

No it's not.
If I switch on at midnight wanting a modicum of stimulation and maybe to phone in, I don't want to have to sit there for 3 hours to achieve that.
I would happily only watch for 30 minutes if the visual stimulus was there.
The only time I will complain about boring, repetitive babes is when they are constantly putting on sub-standard shows and frustrating me to hell!
01-09-2016 12:21
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HEX!T Away
Retired
*****

Posts: 6,298
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 143
Post: #4016
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
but really if shes not doing it for you when you first start watching, why you still watching 3 hours later.

me if shes not on point i look elsewhere and call her instead.
end result the girl who's doing the job well gets the call, the lazy/disinterested girls go without.

so yeah it is. for me at least.

Any Babe pics posted are my Take on existing photographs. credits for the original images stays with the copyright holder if any rights apply.

Today im wearing a gray hat. tomorrow it might be white or black, it depends on my mood
01-09-2016 20:10
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
steviebaby Offline
Posting Machine
*****

Posts: 1,311
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 26
Post: #4017
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
(01-09-2016 20:10 )HEX!T Wrote:  but really if shes not doing it for you when you first start watching, why you still watching 3 hours later.

me if shes not on point i look elsewhere and call her instead.
end result the girl who's doing the job well gets the call, the lazy/disinterested girls go without.

so yeah it is. for me at least.

I wasn't restricting myself to one girlWink
Trouble is some nights there might be 6 babes on and none of them doing it!
that's the point; the general level of stimulating performance is so poor across the board, the chances of switching on and finding something that hits the spot within a reasonable timeframe is pretty remote.
01-09-2016 22:18
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,689
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #4018
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Snookered tries to push a bottle of whipped cream and a bottle of oil through the TV screen for Clare BlushShy.
Doh dammit and feck. It won't work.
Bugger annoyed.
Earth to S66. Oil and whipped cream for Clare please Wink.

(This post was last modified: 03-09-2016 23:26 by Snooks.)
03-09-2016 23:25
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Regenerated Offline
An Unearthly Child
*****

Posts: 20,831
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 184
Post: #4019
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
If only they'd give her something spectacular to work with - a bath set, a shower set, goodness me even a circus set where she could do some ball juggling, you know? Anything to motivate her to move a bit more... Wink

Just kidding. Seriously though - gorgeous lady, awesome body, some very stylish shoes I might add... but we just wish she had a set that would inspire her to do a little bit more movement.

Oh well. Rolleyes Wink

"WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT ACID HOUSE MUSIC?"
BABE OF THE MONTH FOR APRIL: ARURA SKY
04-09-2016 00:12
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snooks Away
Snooker Loopy
*****

Posts: 51,689
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 280
Post: #4020
RE: Clare Richards - Ultimate Babe 2012 & 2014 - Nightshow Chat & Discussion
Oh no Rolleyes.
Bed set Rolleyes.
Channel change required Rolleyes.
Dammit I hate those S66 bed sets so much Rolleyes.

04-09-2016 00:55
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply