Storm - Chat & Discussion

If they did then say that. I can say that the only place i say storm was via the webstream. I have stopped watching since

(01-08-2014 13:10 )southlondonphil Wrote:  

(01-08-2014 12:43 )zizelmy Wrote:  Like they don't get many calls from the webstream?

Didn't Storm actually say at one point that their webstream accounted for almost zero calls? If so it wouldn't be worth the cost of running it.

if the did say they then they are just blatantly lying

like many people, i could only watch Storm thru the stream and called regularly. hence the reason we want to stream back.

the reason they dont want a web stream, they want to save money. simple as that

(04-08-2014 16:51 )richpk Wrote:  if the did say they then they are just blatantly lying

like many people, i could only watch Storm thru the stream and called regularly. hence the reason we want to stream back.

the reason they dont want a web stream, they want to save money. simple as that

You have managed to completely contradict yourself.

First of all you say Storm do profit from the webstream and they are lying if they say otherwise. Then you say they don't profit from the webstream and are saving money by not having it. Your claims are contradictory and can't both be correct, so which one do you think is the truth?

Elle and Daisy both looking smokin' hot tonight .

(04-08-2014 19:47 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(04-08-2014 16:51 )richpk Wrote:  if the did say they then they are just blatantly lying

like many people, i could only watch Storm thru the stream and called regularly. hence the reason we want to stream back.

the reason they dont want a web stream, they want to save money. simple as that

You have managed to completely contradict yourself.

First of all you say Storm do profit from the webstream and they are lying if they say otherwise. Then you say they don't profit from the webstream and are saving money by not having it. Your claims are contradictory and can't both be correct, so which one do you think is the truth?

i didnt contradict myself at all. I was replying to the comment about them saying the webstream generate zero calls, which is a lie

where did i mention profits anywhere in my comment? its a cost cutting measure to get rid of the webstream, thats the only reason to do so but the lie is them claiming it generate ZERO CALLS

wish people actually read comments properly on the internet

(06-08-2014 21:55 )richpk Wrote:  I was replying to the comment about them saying the webstream generate zero calls, which is a lie
wish people actually read comments properly on the internet

No, not zero calls. The comment was ALMOST zero calls.

Wish people actually read comments properly on the internet

(04-08-2014 19:47 )admiral decker Wrote:  

(04-08-2014 16:51 )richpk Wrote:  if the did say they then they are just blatantly lying

like many people, i could only watch Storm thru the stream and called regularly. hence the reason we want to stream back.

the reason they dont want a web stream, they want to save money. simple as that

You have managed to completely contradict yourself.

First of all you say Storm do profit from the webstream and they are lying if they say otherwise. Then you say they don't profit from the webstream and are saving money by not having it. Your claims are contradictory and can't both be correct, so which one do you think is the truth?

You're confusing profit with revenue

(06-08-2014 22:13 )The Silent Majority Wrote:  You're confusing profit with revenue

Where's the confusion then?

Storm don't get enough calls from the webstream to make it worth having, so they don't bother with it. I don't see any confusion.

It's not as simple as counting calls to webstream numbers versus tv numbers.
How do they know that people watching the webstream aren't using the number advertised on the television show. People aren't stupid, if there's money to be saved.

(06-08-2014 22:31 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:  How do they know that people watching the webstream aren't using the number advertised on the television show.

If such a thing was happening then the people responsible have destroyed the webstream by making it seem unprofitable.