Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity

Did anyone catch Strippers on channel 4? Tame compared to confessions of a male stripper that aired a while back. That thing had many close ups of dongs swinging, a woman grabbing at a guys penis for a couple of seconds and even showed an anus. Just don't see how Ofcom can justify it.

(27-02-2014 03:36 )Rigobert16 Wrote:  Just don't see how Ofcom can justify it.

Cos Ofcom is run by a bunch of fucked-in-the-head morons who are convinced every male in the country will turn into rampant rapists if we see too much fanny on tv.

(27-02-2014 03:36 )Rigobert16 Wrote:  Did anyone catch Strippers on channel 4? Tame compared to confessions of a male stripper that aired a while back. That thing had many close ups of dongs swinging, a woman grabbing at a guys penis for a couple of seconds and even showed an anus. Just don't see how Ofcom can justify it.

Yes I did and nothing like male version with full close up penises and erection in pump tube...Double standards so pissed off at this even all the other shows no clits or labia minora or vaginal holes but plenty of penises and testicles close up and prolonged..IF a women opens her legs out come the frigging pIxellated blurriness,, Complain to channel 4, 2-3 times a week with no answer..Sunny Beach was so blOody sexist it was chalk and cheeses with over explicit male genitals yet lass who took knickers off in second programme and lass dancing on bar who stripped got blurred out..Magaluf weekender,what happened in kavos,daughter teenage nudist,on and on penises NO SODDING FEMALE GENITALS..

Oh FFS Channel cocksuckers is blurring out pubic regions on the strippers on Strippers docu,,double standards sexism..Another complaint to Ofcom i am going to ask them to get channel 4 to reply to me why they continue to show explicit male genitals yet censor what a women is born with between her legs.

(27-02-2014 04:57 )hatessexistofcom Wrote:  

(27-02-2014 03:36 )Rigobert16 Wrote:  Did anyone catch Strippers on channel 4? Tame compared to confessions of a male stripper that aired a while back. That thing had many close ups of dongs swinging, a woman grabbing at a guys penis for a couple of seconds and even showed an anus. Just don't see how Ofcom can justify it.

Yes I did and nothing like male version with full close up penises and erection in pump tube...Double standards so pissed off at this even all the other shows no clits or labia minora or vaginal holes but plenty of penises and testicles close up and prolonged..IF a women opens her legs out come the frigging pIxellated blurriness,, Complain to channel 4, 2-3 times a week with no answer..Sunny Beach was so blOody sexist it was chalk and cheeses with over explicit male genitals yet lass who took knickers off in second programme and lass dancing on bar who stripped got blurred out..Magaluf weekender,what happened in kavos,daughter teenage nudist,on and on penises NO SODDING FEMALE GENITALS..

Strippers (new episode) was just on. There were a few clips of a woman sat naked with her legs closed. Her genitals weren't visable but Channel 4 still felt the need to censor her crotch (where her pubic hair would have been)... I think as a nation we are a long way from equal nudity (uncensored female genitalia) when the main sexual TV channel (channel 4) not only censors female genitals but also censors female pubic hair.

(05-03-2014 00:01 )hatessexistofcom Wrote:  Oh FFS Channel cocksuckers is blurring out pubic regions on the strippers on Strippers docu,,double standards sexism..Another complaint to Ofcom i am going to ask them to get channel 4 to reply to me why they continue to show explicit male genitals yet censor what a women is born with between her legs.

Haha u posted whilst I was typing

Impact of Channel 5 Sale

"Dishy" Desmond has agreed to sell Channel 5. That could be good news all round. When he held the licence it was always possible that the Ancient Ones at Riverside House could have declared him not a fit and proper person to hold a broadcasting licence if one of his sex channels went too far, leading to a forced sale of Channel 5 in the middle of a Big Brother season and heavy financial losses. Now that risk is removed the brakes can come off.

Also he might have held back from rude content on Channel 5 because it would instantly have been labelled porn, and who would believe his denials. Imagine the reaction if Desmond had been in charge when A 21st Century Womans Guide To Sex had been made, the sex education show with in vagina ejactulation shots. So Channel 5 could just feel free to have Benny Hill type content and live reports on wet T shirt contests.

Also with £450,000,000 in the bank, Desmond might have a bit of extra cash to shell out on babe shows. Could be a win win situation.


Broadcasters discuss the Broadcasting Code with regulators

Slightly offtopic, but this relates to nudity in public entertainment that Ofcom would not allow on tele, let alone subsidise.

Sadlers Wells "Londons Dance Company" has been showing the Olivier Dubois Company production of Tragédie between 8-10 May. A recap might help if you don't know the work of this French choreographer.

"Focusing on the anatomy of the human body, Tragédie sees nine men and nine women stripped bare both literally and figuratively to explore the human condition. In their exposed nudity, the dancers combine concise repetitious phrases of movement creating a hypnotic chorus where body and soul meet. The action on stage continues to build, creating an engrossing tribal atmosphere, as the piece reaches a thrilling crescendo."
Sadelers Wells



Its serious Art, but.

Sadlers Wells has an annual budget of £14M and received about £1.96Million Government subsidy, paid for by you and me. This is down from about £2,468,189 in 2010/11 but is still significant.

Im not sure which will happen first. Government subsidy from DCMS for an hour of full frontal nudity on British TV. The Rolling Stones and Bruce Forsyth retire totally. Bucks Fizz tour under their original name. Labour remain consistent for an entire week. ABBA reform and tour with Marilyn Manson. But hey, its Art.

A short teaser video is on Vimeo for anyone who wants to learn more.

Teaser Tragedie from Tommy Pascal on Vimeo.

Must go, going to watch an old recording of Angel Long in a short play, and Im looking forward to a thrilling crescendo.

Not that I'm complaining but last night the Horror Channel aired Bare Behind Bars in all it's uncut entirety, that I know because I purchased the DVD 6 years ago off amazon

What I seen was full nudity throughout the whole movie, also what aired was girl on girl and even the use of a dildo being thrust up the snatch too all for good measure.

If even half of what was done in that movie was duplicated on the babe channels then they'd be shut down or heavily sanctioned. What a fucking shambles. Its ok for this type of content to be broadcast on a FTA movie channel but not ok when its one in the 900 section

Just how the fuck do ofcom manage to get away with deploying such double standards

(29-05-2014 20:54 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  Just how the fuck do ofcom manage to get away with deploying such double standards

Because the 900s have premium rate telephone numbers splashed all over the screen.

All bollocks, of course, as the presence of premium rate telephone numbers makes absolutely no difference to the supposed 'harm' such material could cause.