Red Light Central - Chat & Discussion

I agree with the above; such is the varied nature of the babe channels that there is plenty of choice across the board to cater for most tastes. I have varied tastes in women - Rover is totally correct in saying this has nothing to do with age, size, particular looks etc - and if Foxy does do the night shows (and there are far, far more here on this thread who would like you to do them) then she'll soon find that the only ones who either phone her or make comments on this thread are those with positive things to say about her.

There are plenty of other channels that cater for the tastes of the negative contributors here for them to scour and find who/what they want.

Everyones' entitled to their own view, but coming onto an appreciation thread for a channel and making negative comments doesn't really help anyone, does it? Isn't it far better to go to the thread of a channel/babe you DO like and then make a positive comment about said topic?

I just don't understand this pigeon-holing of all the girls on Red Light Central under some sort of unattractive label; for me it's simple - a woman, regardless of age, body-shape or whatever, either DOES it for me in that indefinable way, or she DOESN'T. And there are plenty of girls who are undeniably pretty but who, for some reason, just do not DO it for me, whilst other, far less obviously attractive women DO do it for me, and vice versa. It all boils down to simply personal taste.

(15-01-2011 17:43 )lindor Wrote:  Everyones' entitled to their own view, but coming onto an appreciation thread for a channel and making negative comments doesn't really help anyone, does it? Isn't it far better to go to the thread of a channel/babe you DO like and then make a positive comment about said topic?

Just to clarify a point; this is a discussion thread - members are welcome to appreciate or criticise (within the boundaries set by forum rules).

That said, smelltheroses' post had little to do with this channel itself and more to do with his assessment of its viewers' preferences, including a dated, regurgitated generalisation that people who phone the channels should instead go out and find a real person - as if the two are somehow mutually exclusive. However, with that in mind, I fail to see how his post was criticising the girls or the channel - and therefore what bearing it has on Foxy doing a night show or that it suggests she might be 'slated' if she were to.

Well put Skateguy, Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and has the right to voice that opinion, as long as it's done in a non abusive or insulting way.

If all negative comments or criticism were removed, then this would no longer be a forum, in the true sense of the word.

And on a lighter note, if all negative posts were removed, there would be certain members who would have no posts left.

very true. if i'm not a fan of one of the girls or whatever i jut don't watch them and don't post on them simple. i love all kinds of women but their personality is most important. physical attributes are a welcome bonus but not a neccesity. but like it's been said everyone has and is entitled to an opinion. whether they should share it is a different matter. i could go on but you don't want me rattling on all night.

oh and foxy i would love for you to do a night show you are great personality wise you are a laugh on this forum. lets see how dirty you can be now!!!!

there have been occasions when one performer does it for me one night and then does not do it for me on another night.

if they are all the same then is forum, channels and life would be boring. there are some beautiful women who are a bitch and the unattractive ones are delight to with and visa versa.

it comes down to how the person comes across.

Thanks to all you guys for your wonderful comments and amazing support.

Love
Foxy xxxx

(15-01-2011 10:20 )bigguy01 Wrote:  

(15-01-2011 03:03 )Foxy 911 Wrote:  Well, well, I hope the girls aren't reading these comments!!!

It doesn't do anyone any good reading negative stuff like this!!!! And it's un-necessary!

Looks like I'll be re-thinking my decision to go ahead with a night show if I'm likely to be slated for doing it!!!!

All that said, you're entitled to your opinion.

Foxy

foxy do not let one person ruin your plans for a night show, those that like you will love it if you did a night show.

(15-01-2011 19:45 )skateguy Wrote:  

(15-01-2011 17:43 )lindor Wrote:  Everyones' entitled to their own view, but coming onto an appreciation thread for a channel and making negative comments doesn't really help anyone, does it? Isn't it far better to go to the thread of a channel/babe you DO like and then make a positive comment about said topic?

Just to clarify a point; this is a discussion thread - members are welcome to appreciate or criticise (within the boundaries set by forum rules).

That said, smelltheroses' post had little to do with this channel itself and more to do with his assessment of its viewers' preferences, including a dated, regurgitated generalisation that people who phone the channels should instead go out and find a real person - as if the two are somehow mutually exclusive. However, with that in mind, I fail to see how his post was criticising the girls or the channel - and therefore what bearing it has on Foxy doing a night show or that it suggests she might be 'slated' if she were to.

In his earlier post Smell The Roses did say that Red Light Central was a collection of women who no right minded person would wish to view/phone etc; this could be construed as an insult to the ladies of said channel.

However, Skateguy is right in saying that as this is a discussion thread, rather than an appreciation thread, then ofcourse his views are as relevant as anyone else's.

Don't you find it weird clicking on the RLC section and seeing threads for Tori, Dannii, Dionne....

I was just thinking now that Red Light uses 2 night night time live show feeds 911 and 902 (948 being the same has 902 ) they really need a minimum of 3 girls on the night shows to ensure the girls don't have to do such long shifts and ensure each channels always has a different girl on to the other channel , some of the more energetic girls must be knackered at the end of the long night shifts , also they could do the occasional 2-4-1 when the girls change over . It must be a bit of a culture shock for some of the girls that have moved from other channels were they did shorter sections and had more breaks , it makes sense to keep the girls happy and energised and fresh throughout the long night time hours by giving them plenty of well earned breaks , after all most of their rival channels that have more than 1 channel give their girls more breaks and use more girls . Anyone else think the same or is it just me that thinks this ? .

(16-01-2011 20:37 )mr mystery Wrote:  I was just thinking now that Red Light uses 2 night night time live show feeds 911 and 902 (948 being the same has 902 ) they really need a minimum of 3 girls on the night shows to ensure the girls don't have to do such long shifts and ensure each channels always has a different girl on to the other channel , some of the more energetic girls must be knackered at the end of the long night shifts , also they could do the occasional 2-4-1 when the girls change over . It must be a bit of a culture shock for some of the girls that have moved from other channels were they did shorter sections and had more breaks , it makes sense to keep the girls happy and energised and fresh throughout the long night time hours by giving them plenty of well earned breaks , after all most of their rival channels that have more than 1 channel give their girls more breaks and use more girls . Anyone else think the same or is it just me that thinks this ? .

Totally agree with you there. It's frustrating to sometimes see the same girl on two - or even three - stations at the same time. If the stations occupy so much television space then it's only fair that they should employ more girls as this would help both the girls, who'd benefit from a well-earned break, and the viewer, who'd have more of a choice.