Are you as surprised as me at how short so many of the girls are??

I don't know about you, but I've always associated "models" as being at least 5 ft 8 and above, but when you look at some of their official profiles it's amazing how many of them are only in the 5ft 4 to 5ft 6 range (Paige Taylor, Lolly Badcock etc).

OK, so it's hard to tell off the tele but take somebody like Dannii Harwood off Bangbabes or Daryl Morgan on Babestation - don't they look about 5ft 10??

Yet Dannii is only 5ft 6 and Daryl is only 5ft 2!!!!! (Dannii is actually an inch shorter than her mate Lucy Zara)

Tammy Oldham is only 5ft 1!!

I think Camilla on Babestation is one of the taller ones at 5ft 9.

All I need now is to find out that Adele Taylor has escaped from a midget colony and is really only 4ft 3 and my life will be over.....

You tend to associate catwalk models with being tall, but not glamour models.

Alex Adams and Holly James are both tiny too.

I was also quite surprised when a saw some of the official stats of the girls on these shows , i was really surprised to find out Daryl Morgan is only 5ft 2 , i always thought she was around 5ft 7 . Charlie C from BS is also around 5ft 2 i believe , can't remember her exact stats , Jemma J and Donna Duke are also very small . Amanda Rendall and big sister Caty Cole are only around 5ft, Caty my be even smaller . Megan Coxxx from Bangbabes is quite tall compared to some of the other girl on these shows , i think if i remember correctly she is around 5ft 8 or 5ft 9 . PS , not sure what height Adele is but she looks quite tall when i have seen her stood along side some of the other girls .

Its not how big they are standing up.

Its how long they can go lying down.

As they tell us men. Size doesn't matter

Maybe if they had been taller, some of them would have gone into a normal modelling career instead of the Babeshows.
So its a process of natural selection, ending up with more shorter girls on the Babeshows, where height is not important.
I think Yvette was pretty tall though.

I was surprised at how short petite Jasmine Jones was (5' 3" apparently) but all I can say is every inch of her looks fantastic.

D G x x x

Petite or cute, not short!

Its not really important to be honest, a few are strapping - Alice Goodwin, Danica, Danielle Maye

(17-09-2010 18:53 )mikeboob Wrote:  Petite or cute, not short!

Its not really important to be honest, a few are strapping - Alice Goodwin, Danica, Danielle Maye

Goodness, no, I wasn't being critical - they're all gorgeous, far above anything I could ever hope for and if Daryl or Tammy did ever come knocking on my door I wouldn't kick them out for only being 5ft 2 - even though they're very different characters they both look like the type that would get stuck in and thinking about it they might make an interesting threesome.......................................................​................................................................​................................................................​............................................(sorry, mind's starting to wander).........................................................​......................................................it's just that as I said, I always associate girls in this industry with being tall and leggy. Most of them would have started doing glamour shoots and mens mags etc rather than "soft porn" and it was just a surprise to find out how "petite" they were.

Ha ha... they're all funsize and bitesize lol

I can't honestly say that it's a massive shock - the fact that many of the girls are relatively 'petite' (I like that particular euphemism) possibly also accounts for their extreme curviness - now I'm no expert on things like BMI etc, but I'd have imagined that taller girls would (by and large - poor choice of words?) be proportionately slenderer (I am now just inventing words on the fly I think?) and more likely to go down the starvation/catwalk model route.
Also, I think it's likely that an issue of scale plays a part; if you have a petite girl who is pleasantly endowed and then zoom in on her whilst she's filmed against a 'scale-less' setting, she'll appear as a massively-endowed amazon who'd kill you in bed. If one looks at a buxom bombshell on screen and thinks "Mein GOTT! She has der enormous boobies!" then the illusion is clearly complete - I'm not saying the babes DON'T have big boobies, BUT they are actually a more plausible size than the camera would suggest.
Any other thoughts on this? It's an interesting topic...

Missing key events. Talking bollocks. Making stuff up.
~~~SAVE THE KRILL!~~~