Amanda - Caps & Vids

she was sporting a lovely http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBIGwtyqBhA last night

Some more ammunition for Ofcom.



8Mb
http://rapidshare.com/files/301486127/Am...09_001.MPG

SloMo 8Mb
http://rapidshare.com/files/301487213/Am..._SloMo.mpg



6Mb
http://rapidshare.com/files/301485599/Am...09_002.MPG

SloMo 4Mb
http://rapidshare.com/files/301486489/Am..._SloMo.mpg

I expect a fine and warning from ofcom is not far off.
Make the most of it you Sky viewers, before it becomes tamed down to the level of the freeview show.
In the meantime, please keep posting the pics and vids for us freeviewers.

(01-11-2009 15:47 )Shirtfull Wrote:  A couple of vids of Amanda last nite 311009, with SloMo.

I keep getting told only premium users can download the vid. Is this a permanent thing for this clip or is worth trying later?

(02-11-2009 20:08 )TheWatcher Wrote:  I expect a fine and warning from ofcom is not far off.

Usually I'd be inclined to agree, but I'm not so sure. There's so much goes on behind the scenes that we know nothing about. Sure we can read the Ofcom bulletins, but that gives us just a fraction. I can't imagine why Bangbabes would so blatantly risk huge fines, unless they're making far more money than they'd like us to believe. I personally think there's been some relaxation of the rules that we're not privy to.

The way I see it is the producers are feeling around for a set of barriers that only ofcom know the whereabouts of.

You have to consider what is seen, the context it's seen in, the length of time it's seen for and the time of night it's seen at. (ofcom have invented a 'sliding watershed', how thoughtful of them )

None of which is actually quantified by the boneheads at ofcom, they just assume we can get a handle into their grubby little minds and 'just know...OK.'

If you throw in the mix Amanda being naughtier than the producers want as well as the producers adding a false air of 'naughtiness' on their own and you end up with what we have now.

In the last round of 'complaints' one complaint was upheld and one was dismissed. Its unclear as to why, but the time the fanny was flashed for seemed to be the factor that saved one incident and got the other a fine.

So...wtf? Do you know?


...coz I don't.


So, yeah, I expect a fine soon too. Amanda has well smashed past any ofcom barriers that were there. She's swore on the mic and given us fanny, ass and penetration shots all weakend.

I expect them to pay up as well.


...so put your sticks and stones away guys and girls...this 'aint the revolution yet.

(02-11-2009 22:26 )TheDarkKnight Wrote:  So...wtf? Do you know?

...coz I don't.

Neither do Ofcunt, which is why they make the rules up as they go along.

(02-11-2009 22:26 )TheDarkKnight Wrote:  So, yeah, I expect a fine soon too. Amanda has well smashed past any ofcom barriers that were there. She's swore on the mic and given us fanny, ass and penetration shots all weakend.

I expect them to pay up as well.


...so put your sticks and stones away guys and girls...this 'aint the revolution yet.

So you also think that Bangbabes are simply willing to risk massive fines? It doesn't add up, if you ask me.

@StanTheMan
I suggest trying later.

I don't think they deliberately set out to get fined. I think if they do get fined, it would be because of Amanda going further than they wanted to.

(02-11-2009 23:55 )Shirtfull Wrote:  @StanTheMan
I suggest trying later.

Thanks, Shirtfull, will do.